Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
"There is no progress in art, any more than there is progress in making love. There are simply different ways of doing it." Man Ray

ci kim - the (solo) artist

May 16th 2007 01:45
ci kim piece
i went and saw ci kim's exhibition, 'sad tiger's self navigation' at the arario gallery last week. some of his pieces were really quite nice with the overall flow of the exhibition telling a very detailed story as i walked around the space. one of his pieces struck me as my favorite which i earmarked to read about after the gallery, and as i was sitting having a cigarette and a latte after the show, i read that a friend nearly ruined this piece after a night of drinking and art 'creation'. funny, my favorite piece wasn't even done (partially) by the artist i went to see.


this started me thinking about art in general. is it ever created for anyone other than the artist? this exhibition was written up as the artists 'self journey' to discover his own art style while telling a story about the children's alphabet book 'trauriger tiger toastet tomaten' by nadia budde. and i think back to standing in the gallery, interpreting the pieces as i was, giving it credit, appreciating the works for what they were, when i realised i had been suckered into one mans self indulgent art realm. he was showing me where he had started, his journey through, and finally where he had ended up during this self development stage. but is that the idea of art generally i wondered?

i believe art should be funny, should tell a strong narrative (albeit a loose one), should be able to be linked to a certain time, and should represent an area within respect to a global ideology. that is only my opinion and probably my favorite type of art. but that made me think is art always created as a self indulgence by the artist? is there any art that has been created by the artist that they didn't feel a connection to? could it be said that artists should always wear their hearts on their sleeves when they create something?


this exhibition left me pondering many questions after i had consumed it, which is something that is synonymous with good art. at first i felt not completely satisfied with seeing one man's journey through 'his' mid life crisis, but then was appreciative that he had stirred other questions and emotions within. i guess he had in essence done a trick on me after all.
ci kim
thanks to arario gallery for the images
72
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
10 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by postmoderncritic

May 16th 2007 02:13
Wow, I love the second image's construction of disorder within the art gallery space - it must've been wonderful to walk around in that space, having to dodge items on the floor and literally make your own way through the colourful 'debris'!

I think that art can go through many permutations of meaning, especially during different stages. For instance, creating something for yourself encourages you to think in a very different space than selling it to an art gallery and then having people inspect it and make comments must add different layers of meaning. You see your work as interpreted by other people, which changes how you feel about it personally to some extent.

Very interesting and intelligent post! )

Comment by Jonathon

May 16th 2007 07:05
postmoderncritic,

thanks for your comments. i think that is the big one with any form of self expression. do you create differently when you know it is for someone else? did you write that comment intending it for me, or was it something that was truly from your creativeness? perhaps that was the catch with the entire exhibition, one man's self journey with the intention to sell it at the end. clearly given it its own overriding path. nice angle.

Comment by Anonymous

May 16th 2007 07:20
Great question, I thought I was creating a reply that would interest and satisfy me, because it's up to you whether you respond or not. Now that I'm being questioned about my own processes it gives me the opportunity to re-examine them more deeply and think more about the effect I intended to have... which is wonderful!

Thanks for the convo~ )

Comment by postmoderncritic

May 16th 2007 07:21
Sorry, that was by me, aka postmoderncritic

Comment by Jonathon

May 16th 2007 07:23
you're welcome

Comment by Tersch

May 18th 2007 03:28
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...
So is appreciation.
Sure you could analyse it down and look at brush strokes and what this or that means but in the end, the only question that matters is..."Do I like it?"
The question you pose is very interesting though, and funny enough could be asked of bloggers as well.....think about it

Comment by Jonathon

May 18th 2007 06:17
hey tersch,

i think we sometimes get wrapped up in the meaning of things, and actually forget about the end result. as a producer of something, sometimes the journey is more interesting then the final result, but not always as the consumer as they might be searching simply for aesthetic.

and yes blogging is a form of art in a way so it falls under this umbrella too.

Comment by Tersch

May 19th 2007 03:33
From my own experience in producing art, I myself couldn't care less what the world sees it as once I'm done. The doing and the expression is what it's all about for me. I'm not applying this to any other artist but myself as to talk about other's ways and intentions is merely to speculate.

Comment by Mrs M

May 24th 2007 14:04
Hi Johnathon,

I'm not an artist per se but I am a creative type so I'll take a stab at answering your question about art ever being for anyone else other than the artist.

I think it depends on when in your career you are creating it.

Go with me on this one...I'm taking the parent's point of view. My 6 year old daughter LOVES to draw and paint and when she is in the thick of it you can see that she just transforms (her dad is pretty good at art). But because she is so young she really looks for praise from me and her dad. But I'm sure that when she realises that she's good at what she does my approval won't matter.

But I'd imagine one thing is constant...while she's in the thick of creative...it's all about her and for her.

Good post.

Love & stuff
Mrs M

Comment by Jonathon

May 27th 2007 05:24
hey mrs m,

well i suppose it starts at an early age then, and that pretty much confirms that artists (generally speaking) are creating something that is self expressive. excellent point and a nice way of approaching this.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
3 Posts
88 Posts dating from November 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Jonathon's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Jonathon
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]